{"id":3472,"date":"2022-09-15T09:17:07","date_gmt":"2022-09-15T14:17:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/illinoistax.org\/?p=3472"},"modified":"2022-09-15T09:40:19","modified_gmt":"2022-09-15T14:40:19","slug":"sales-taxes-in-chicago-a-neighborhood-level-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/illinoistax.org\/?p=3472","title":{"rendered":"Sales Taxes in Chicago: A Neighborhood Level Review"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sales Taxes in Chicago: A Neighborhood Level Review<\/u><\/strong><\/h3>\n

 <\/p>\n

September 2022 (75.6)<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

We have been trying to answer the question of why Chicago\u2019s per capita sales tax collections (and accordingly its per capita retail sales) are below the statewide average, given the city\u2019s significant tourism, entertainment, and business activities.\u00a0 In the August issue of Tax Facts<\/em> we looked at per capita retail sales in Chicago, Suburban Cook County, and Illinois statewide, by category of retailer.\u00a0 The starkest difference was in automobile and gasoline sales, but Chicago trailed suburban and statewide averages in nearly all categories.<\/p>\n

Next, we turn to differences within Chicago, using the Illinois Department of Revenue\u2019s sales tax collections by ZIP code. As the discussion below indicates, much of the data is consistent with our expectations (high volumes in the Loop, for example), and helps fill in the blanks when trying to understand why Chicago\u2019s sales per capita lags the statewide average.<\/p>\n

What Sales, When, and Where?
\n<\/strong>For our comparisons, we look at the 1 percent Municipal Sales Tax (part of the state\u2019s 6.25 percent sales tax) imposed on all taxable sales, including drugs and groceries, administered by the Department of Revenue and returned to local governments based on the point of sale.\u00a0 We added neighborhoods (community areas from the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission) to help readers who have not memorized all Chicago ZIP codes.\u00a0 We use 2019 data because that was the latest year available from the Census Bureau when we first began examining Chicago\u2019s low collections.\u00a0 It has the added advantage of being before COVID-19 turned retail on its ear.<\/p>\n

It’s worth noting that this data tells us where the retailer<\/em> is located, not the buyer.\u00a0 The sale to a Chicagoan living near the Indiana border who treks to Cartier on Michigan Avenue to buy a luxury watch will be credited to 60611 (Navy Pier and the Magnificent Mile).\u00a0 Similarly, if that person drives to Indiana to buy a pair of jeans, the sale will not appear in the data.<\/p>\n

The Appendix at the end of this article includes all of the data we have for Chicago ZIP codes in 2019: total Municipal Sales Tax, population, Municipal Sales Tax per capita and taxable retail sales per capita (the municipal sales tax x 100\/population).<\/p>\n

High Per Capita Sales Downtown
\n<\/strong>Within the City, retail sales per capita vary widely, from $491,414 per person in ZIP code 60603 (Loop between Madison and Jackson) to $2,195 in 60633 (Hegewisch on the Indiana border).\u00a0 The ZIP codes with the 10 highest and lowest per capita retail sales are shown in Charts 1A and 1B<\/strong>.\u00a0 <\/strong>All of the top 10 per capita ZIP codes are downtown, in or near the Loop, with an average per capita retail sales of $138,313, significantly above the statewide average of $15,000 per capita. The farthest away of the 10 was the Near West Side.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The results confirm our assumption that downtown businesses (this was before COVID) and tourism would drive up Chicago sales tax collections.\u00a0 We also have this data broken down by category of retailers, which we examined on a citywide level in the last issue of Tax Facts. In the Top 10 per capita ZIP codes, bars and restaurants accounted for 43 percent of all sales tax collections; citywide bars and restaurants accounted for 28 percent.<\/p>\n

Turning to the 10 ZIP codes with the lowest per capita collections, the differences are stark.\u00a0 The average retail sales per capita is $2,930 (remember, this includes groceries and medicine), roughly 2 percent of the average for the 10 highest ZIP codes and well below the statewide average of $15,000.\u00a0 The lowest ZIP codes are primarily on the city\u2019s south and west sides, where the limited retail presence has been a frequent topic of discussion in recent years.<\/p>\n

A striking aspect of the Loop ZIP codes is the low population, averaging less than 1,600 residents.\u00a0 It\u2019s no wonder, then, that the per capita numbers are high: if the highest per capita ZIP code, 60603, were relocated to the ZIP code with the highest population, 60629 (West Lawn and Chicago Lawn), the per capita retail sales for those retailers would fall from $491,414 to a more modest $4,698.\u00a0 Accordingly, while the per capita figures are highest in the Loop, that is heavily a function of low population; total retail sales are not all that high.<\/p>\n

High Total Retail Sales Elsewhere
\n<\/strong>The ZIP code with the highest total retail sales is 60611, which includes Navy Pier and the Magnificent Mile, followed by Lincoln Park, Old Town, Logan Square and Lakeview.\u00a0 All have significantly more residents than do the Loop ZIP codes and are also destinations for shopping, eating, and drinking.\u00a0 All told, the top 10 ZIP codes account for 41 percent of Chicago\u2019s retail sales; those same ZIP codes represent 21 percent of the city\u2019s population.\u00a0 Interestingly, despite the high total sales, three of these top 10 ZIP codes, in Logan Square, Belmont Cragin, and Irving Park, were still below the $15,000 statewide per capita average.\u00a0 See Chart 2A.<\/strong><\/p>\n

On the other end of the spectrum, the lowest 10 ZIP codes in terms of total retail sales account for 7 percent of total tax collections, despite being home to 11 percent of Chicago\u2019s population. Not surprisingly, 9 of the 10 are below the statewide per capita average as well. The exception is Loop ZIP code 60604, which had a population of less than 1,000, so even though it had among the lowest total retail sales, it had the third highest per capita collections. See Chart 2B<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The Border Question
\n<\/strong>There are some peculiarities, particularly on the border.\u00a0 ZIP codes do not respect the city\u2019s boundaries so we can expect some oddities because the Census counts all the people in a ZIP code, while Chicago tax data only includes tax collected from sales within Chicago.\u00a0 Still we see retail sales lower than we would expect in several ZIPs that are wholly on the Chicago side of the border:\u00a0 60630 (Forest Glen and Jefferson Park), 60655 (Mount Greenwood), 60631 (Edison Park), and 60633 (Hegewisch).\u00a0 Proximity to Chicago\u2019s borders makes it seem likely that residents are leaving Chicago to make purchases.<\/p>\n

Under Illinois law, municipalities may enter into rebate agreements with retailers to encourage them to locate within their boundaries by sharing a portion of the sales tax collected.\u00a0 Chicago does not enter into these agreements, but according to data compiled by the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, in 2019 there were 118 such agreements in Suburban Cook County and 545 in the seven-county region around Chicago.\u00a0 Municipalities near Chicago entering into such agreements may be responsible for more retailers opening outside city borders than would otherwise be the case, drawing shoppers from Chicago.\u00a0 In August we showed that Chicago had fewer big box stores than the rest of the state and if rebate agreements contribute to those location decisions it could explain the city\u2019s low per capita sales in ZIP codes near the border.<\/p>\n

Conclusion
\n<\/strong>Retail sales per capita within Chicago vary greatly by neighborhood.\u00a0 As we had postulated, they were particularly high downtown, driven by business, retail, and tourism operations located there.\u00a0 However, particularly in the Loop, the per capita numbers are inflated by relatively low numbers of residents, and these neighborhoods do not generate the highest volume of retail sales overall.<\/p>\n

The ZIP codes that generate the largest levels of retail sales come from North Michigan Avenue and Navy Pier, followed by Lincoln Park, Old Town and Logan Square.\u00a0 Interestingly, three of Chicago\u2019s top 10 generators of retail sales have per capita sales below the $15,000 statewide average.\u00a0 In other words, even neighborhoods with fairly high sales volume from a City-wide perspective fall below the statewide numbers.<\/p>\n

The high per capita retail sales numbers in downtown Chicago are offset by lower collections in neighborhoods with larger populations, leaving Chicago\u2019s per capita retail sales below Illinois\u2019 state-wide average.\u00a0 In our next and final article on Chicago\u2019s sales tax, we will explore the relationship between retail sales and household income.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sales Taxes in Chicago: A Neighborhood Level Review   September 2022 (75.6)   We have been trying to answer the question of why Chicago\u2019s per capita sales tax collections (and accordingly its per capita retail sales) are below the statewide average, given the city\u2019s significant…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[15],"class_list":["post-3472","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-tax","tag-sales-tax"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/illinoistax.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3472","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/illinoistax.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/illinoistax.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/illinoistax.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/illinoistax.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3472"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/illinoistax.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3472\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3482,"href":"https:\/\/illinoistax.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3472\/revisions\/3482"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/illinoistax.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/illinoistax.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/illinoistax.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}